• A meat substitute (left) resembles chicken meat (right), but its proteins are not absorbed as well by human cells.
Credit: Adapted from Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2022, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01711
    A meat substitute (left) resembles chicken meat (right), but its proteins are not absorbed as well by human cells. Credit: Adapted from Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 2022, DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.2c01711
Close×

A study in the US shows human cells absorb less protein from plant-based meat than from chicken, with researchers saying the findings will drive further studies on what ingredients could boost the peptide uptake of alternative meats.

The paper was reported in the American Chemical Society (ACS) Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.

“To mimic the look and texture of the real thing, plants are dehydrated into a powder and mixed with seasonings. Then, the mixtures are typically heated, moistened and processed through an extruder.

“These products are often thought of as being more healthful than animal meats because the plants used to make them are high in protein and low in undesirable fats,” the researchers from Ohio State University said.

Lab tests showed proteins in substitutes did not break down into peptides as well as conventional meats.

The team made a model meat alternative made from soy and wheat gluten, with a similar fibrous structure as chicken.

The model and chicken were cooked, ground up, and the broken down with an enzyme humans use to digest food.

The plant-based meat peptides were less water-soluble than chicken and no absorbed as well as the chicken.

The researches said this knowledge could be used to develop more healthful products.

Full study is here.

Packaging News

APCO has released its 2022-23 Australian Packaging Consumption and Recovery Data Report, the second report released this year in line with its commitment to improving timeliness and relevance of data. 

The AFGC has welcomed government progress towards implementing clear, integrated and consistent changes to packaging across Australia, but says greater clarity is needed on design standards.

It’s been a tumultuous yet progressive year in packaging in Australia, with highs and lows playing out against a backdrop of uncertainty caused in part by the dangling sword of DCCEEW’s proposed Packaging Reform, and in part by the mounting pressure of rising manufacturing costs. Lindy Hughson reviews the top stories for 2024.